I
was reminded of these lines that I learnt in my sixth standard
Sanskrit lessons a few days ago:
satyam
brūyat_priyam brūyan_na brūyāt_satyam_apriyam ।
priyam
cha nānṛitam brūyādéṣha dharmaḥ sanātanaḥ
Manu
talks about Sanatana Dharma in the verse. The translation ' Say what
is true, say what is sweet, but do not say what is true but not
sweet, nor say what is sweet but not true. This is the perennial
wisdom.' (courtesy: blog.practicalsanskrit.com)
In
essence, he says do not speak harsh truths or (more dangerous) sweet
lies. This knowledge was imparted by my teacher, when I was very
young, and too naive to grasp what it actually embodied. However, the
verse stuck on to me and I have followed this philosophy all my life.
What
is truth? It's purpose is not merely to set the speaker free, but also to empower the listener. If a truth is being said just to
clear the speaker's conscience, but adds absolutely no value to the
listener, or goes to the extent of hurting them, then it should not
be told.
For
instance, let's assume that a friend, after saving up some money from
his first job, buys you a gift, which you do not particularly like,
what would you do? You could either bluntly state the truth and say
that you did not like the gift, or choose to say nothing at all, and
accept it graciously. Here, the gift is not just a mere material
indulgence, it has a strong emotional undertone because it has been
brought out of love. It has been chosen carefully and has been given
to you with respect and love. In such a case, the truth becomes
obsolete. If you still chose to speak the truth, then it is
equivalent to using the truth as a tool to satisfy a very selfish
purpose – putting your mind at ease.
Truth is powerful. It can set you free sometimes, but it can also shatter the world around you. I believe you can brutally honest to yourself and to others too, as long as your truth does not harm them. Once, I was travelling to a friend's place for dinner. She had come all the way from the UK and was calling a select group of friends for some dinner at home. She had started cooking for all of us as soon as she had woken up that day and even kept text messaging her attempts at making dinner. In short, she was excited to have us over. However, I reached late because I started late and as a result got caught in the traffic jam. Now, when asked why I had reached so late, I could have said 'I started late' or 'I got caught in traffic'. While the first one is the truth, the second reason is partially a white lie.
If I told her that I had started late, it would be truthful. It would set me free. It would help me enjoy the rest of the evening, but it would upset her. It would amount to her thinking that she was cooking for someone who did not even appreciate her time (which was never true). It would ruin her end of the evening. In such cases, does it really make sense for a person to know the truth? It does not do her good, it does not do anyone good - it probably teaches me to start ten minutes early next time I go to her house. So, doesn't it make sense for me to hide under the white lie and keep everyone happy?
So, each time I want to pass a comment on what I really think of a shirt someone is wearing, on why a friend is holding onto the past, on why a certain idea will never work out - I think. I think several times. Will speaking the truth help the person in the smallest way possible? If not, I do not shy away from saying a white lie and repeating it, if happiness is the solace the person is seeking.
